Reporting Licensed Therapists
REPORTING A THERAPIST FOR UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR IS A SERIOUS DECISION.
THIS IS FOR INFORMATIONAL/EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
Reporting a therapist for unethical behavior is a serious responsibility, as it protects both individual clients and the integrity of the mental health profession.
Therapists hold a position of trust, and any violation—such as breaching confidentiality, exploiting clients, or engaging in inappropriate relationships, and acting unethically online—can cause lasting harm. Speaking up ensures that harmful practices are addressed, potentially preventing further damage to vulnerable individuals seeking care and for individuals who end up viewing/consuming content that they did not actively seek.
At the same time, reporting should be done thoughtfully and based on clear evidence and not emotion, since such accusations can significantly impact a therapist’s career and reputation. Ultimately, taking action reinforces accountability, upholds ethical standards, and safeguards the therapeutic environment as a place of healing and professionalism. It is not appropriate or helpful to send letters anonymously, have no credible evidence, or just because you are emotionally angry at your personal situation.
​
Reporting will require your identity, and even though the process is supposed to be anonymous, please understand any legal implications in your state, or the state where the therapist practices, to protect yourself.A licensing board will only consider your complaint if you provide clear and irrefutable evidence of how the licensed practitioner has violated either the laws in their state, or their applicable code of conduct. Your complaint must be based on one, or more, of the following:
​
-
Violation of law or ethics codes: The complaint must allege conduct that breaks the state’s mental health licensing law or a professional code of ethics (such as those from the ACA, AAMFT, or NASW). Examples include breaches of confidentiality, sexual or romantic relationships with clients, financial exploitation, practicing without a license, discrimination, or gross incompetence.
-
Evidence and specificity: Boards usually require specific, factual information rather than vague dissatisfaction. Dates, times, documentation, and direct examples carry much more weight than general statements.
-
Jurisdiction: The professional must be licensed (or seeking licensure) in that state, and the alleged behavior must have occurred while they were acting in their professional capacity.
-
Harm or risk of harm: The behavior must pose, or have posed, actual or potential harm to the client or public. Boards generally do not act on issues of personality conflicts, minor communication problems, or simple dissatisfaction with therapy.
​
If you still believe that you need to report a licensed practitioner, you can look up the state where the person practices below. Please note that it is important to get their license number and to ensure that they, indeed, have authorization to practice in their state.​​​​​
​
ONE OF THE GREATEST GAINS THAT WE CAN
HOPE TO ACHIEVE IS THAT ALL LICENSED THERAPISTS
MUST BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY POST THEIR
CONTACT INFORMATION AND LICENSE INFORMATION
ON ANY PAGE OR WEBSITE WHERE THEY ARE LEADING
WITH THEIR LICENSE. THERE SHOULD BE A SPIRIT
OF ACCOUNTABILITY, ETHICS, AND TRANSPARENCY
THAT IS SEVERELY LACKING IN THIS ONLINE NICHE.

IF YOU ARE A THERAPIST
This page may seem like
there is a growing community
of angry estranged parents who
are looking to lash out and to
attack the professional mental
health practitioners.
This is not accurate.
And if you feel that way, then you have completely misunderstood the
concern. If a practitioner is going to lead with their license, then they have to assume the liability.
​​
The concern is that there are
therapists who are are actively building online platforms/pages,
leading with their license, and
who create and launch content that is considered harmful by your own code of ethics, specifically beneficence.
​​
There is a concern that online
licensed therapists are
encouraging self-diagnosis and
the layperson's diagnosis of other
people, specifically family, in their
lives without any bonafide
face-to-face interaction with
legitimate clients in a clinical setting.
​​
This is a gray area from an
ethics perspective, but this is a
harmful area for many unintended consumers. The influence is having negative ripple effects that cannot be accurately measured.
​​
If a licensed therapist chooses to create a platform to speak
educationally, to inform others
about their practice and about
strategies for improving one's
well-being, then that is considered
legitimate and ethical.
​​
However, if a licensed therapist chooses to create a platform based on the consolidation of an entire demographic of people, to encourage others to participate in harmful generic responses (e.g., no contact) to their personal situation, and with that comes an encouragement to make choices based on self-diagnosis, or diagnosing others, that is harmful.
This is especially harmful when they do not respect the continuum of estrangement and fail to be inclusive of all perspectives, even going so far as to malign an entire demographic of parents. This also causes further ethical considerations when those same therapists are encouraging people to subscribe to their content, purchase their resources, or attend their seminars.
​​​
This is not a witch hunt. Most everyone supports ethical mental health practitioners. We are asking you to hold each other accountable and to maintain the esteem of your profession by not allowing these creators to blight the mental health professional community. You have each spent tens of thousands of dollars and countless hours pursuing your education and licensure, which is being completely tarnished by some online therapists who malign the general practice of counseling and therapy.